WASHINGTON (AP) — The average fair market value of
top-tier college football and men's basketball players is over $100,000 each,
and the athletes are entitled to at least a portion of that, a new report from
an advocacy group argues.
Instead of getting what they're worth, the players
receive athletic scholarships that don't cover the full cost of attending
school, leaving many of them living below the poverty line, says the report,
"The Price of Poverty in Big Time College Sport."
A national college athletes' advocacy group and a
sports management professor calculate in the report that if college sports
shared their revenues the way pro sports do, the average Football Bowl
Subdivision player would be worth $121,000 per year, while the average
basketball player at that level would be worth $265,000.
The Associated Press obtained a copy of the report
ahead of its official release, scheduled for Tuesday.
Ramogi Huma, a former UCLA linebacker who heads the
National College Players Association, wrote the report with Drexel University
professor Ellen J. Staurowsky. The association is an advocacy group for college
athletes which Huma says has more than 14,000 members — about half of whom are
currently enrolled.
Huma and Staurowsky argue that the players should
receive a portion of new revenues, like TV contracts, to be put in an
"educational lockbox." Players could tap those funds to help cover
educational costs if they exhaust their athletic eligibility before they
graduate — or receive the money with no strings attached upon graduating. They
also propose that athletes be free to seek commercial deals, such as
endorsements, with some of the money from that going to the lockbox, and the
rest available for the athlete's immediate use.
They also say that schools should pay for costs
beyond the tuition, student fees and room and board covered by athletic
scholarships. The report calculates the shortfall for the full cost of
attending college — when things such as clothing and emergency trips home are
added in — at $952 to $6,127, depending on the college. That leaves students on
full athletic scholarships living below the poverty line at around 85 percent
of the schools, the report claims, by comparing the value of the scholarship's
room and board to the federal poverty guideline for a single individual.
Huma acknowledged that calculation does not take
into account financial assistance students might get from home, or summer jobs,
but he said most athletes are pressured to attend voluntary summer workouts,
making it hard to get outside work.
The report calls for action from Congress to
achieve some of these goals, arguing that federal intervention is necessary
because college presidents aren't in a position to take meaningful reform. The
NCAA, which puts the athletes' amateur status at the center of its mission,
would oppose much of what the report proposes.
In a statement Monday, the NCAA said it had not yet
reviewed the report, but that President Mark Emmert and university presidents
made it clear at last month's retreat — a meeting called in the wake of a run
of scandals in college football — that they were committed to evaluating an
increase to grants in aid that would cover the full cost of attending college.
The NCAA added that the Committee on Academic Performance is meeting this week
to discuss the issue, and will make recommendations to the Division I Board of
Directors next month.
"Dr. Emmert has been similarly clear that
paying student-athletes a salary is in no way on the table," the NCAA
said.
The report argues that playing big-time football
and basketball is a full-time job, and an NCAA study released this year backs
that up. It found that players in the Football Bowl Subdivision — the highest
level — reported spending 43.3 hours per week during the season in athletic
time commitment, while Division I men's basketball players reported 39 hours a
week in season.
The report said that players at the most powerful
programs are worth far in excess of even the average athlete. The report
estimates that Duke's basketball players are worth the most, at around $1
million each, while Texas' football players top that sport at $513,000 each.
Officials at Texas and Duke did not return email
and phone messages Monday.
The report argues that the main beneficiaries of
preserving the current system for athletes are coaches, athletic directors,
conference commissioners and bowl directors, citing, for example, the
multimillion-dollar salaries of several high-profile coaches.
"The NCAA's definition of amateurism has
proven to be priceless to obscenely paid coaches, athletics administrators, and
colleges but has inflicted poverty on college athletes," the report
charges. It found that some football coaches' bonuses alone were worth more
than the entire scholarship shortfall for their teams.
Huma and Staurowsky argue that compensating players
would go a long way to eliminating the black market, in which athletes have
violated rules for accepting things of value.
"Rules that prohibit valuable players from
accepting benefits above and beyond their scholarships set athletic programs
and their players up for failure," they say, citing the case of former USC
receiver R. Jay Soward, who told Sports Illustrated last year that he took
money from NFL agent Josh Luchs because his scholarship didn't cover his food
and rent costs.
"I would do it again," Soward said.
"I have four sons, and if somebody offered my son money in college and it
meant he didn't have to be hungry, I would tell him to take it."
The recent scandal at Ohio State involved players
trading memorabilia for cash and tattoos from a man at the center of a federal
investigation. And the University of Miami is being investigated by the NCAA
for the relationship a rogue booster and Ponzi scheme artist had with players
and coaches.
Huma, who graduated from UCLA in 1999, said that he
struggled to get by on his full athletic scholarship. Even though the school
was providing him with three meals a day, he said, he needed to eat five or six
times a day because of the calories he was burning playing football. And he
wasn't able to get any support from home.
"I got by taking toilet paper and soap at
hotels, and taking out the credit card," he recalled, adding that he had
$6,000 in credit card debt when he graduated. The school did provide him with
team-issued clothing, but not all of it was appropriate for everyday use, he
said.
"The bottom line is that players are misled
into thinking that their labor will fully pay their way through school, and
they are definitely earning much less than their fair market value," he
said.
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press.






